PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.05%
Positive EBIT growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.97%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
12.50%
Positive EPS growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
12.50%
Positive diluted EPS growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
14.90%
Share change of 14.90% while CGAU is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
14.90%
Diluted share count expanding well above CGAU's 0.18%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.44%
Positive OCF growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
84.59%
Positive FCF growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-54.16%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-54.16%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU is at 10.15%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
13.48%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
14.04%
Positive 10Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
14.04%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-304.47%
Negative 3Y CAGR while CGAU is 33.89%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-49.97%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while CGAU stands at 127.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-49.97%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 79.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-32.13%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 86.58%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.31%
Our AR growth while CGAU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.98%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-14.03%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.05%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.