PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.45%
EBIT growth above 1.5x CGAU's 13.76%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
44.45%
Operating income growth above 1.5x CGAU's 13.76%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
44.46%
Net income growth above 1.5x CGAU's 14.35%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
44.44%
EPS growth above 1.5x CGAU's 13.04%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
44.44%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x CGAU's 13.04%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.03%
Share count expansion well above CGAU's 0.01%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.03%
Diluted share count expanding well above CGAU's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.67%
Negative OCF growth while CGAU is at 43.64%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-81.10%
Negative FCF growth while CGAU is at 26.82%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.07%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
38.07%
Positive OCF/share growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
85.35%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-98.58%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-98.58%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while CGAU is 52.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
88.82%
Positive short-term CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-34.68%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while CGAU stands at 101.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-34.68%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 77.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-34.20%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 71.99%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.49%
Asset growth well under 50% of CGAU's 1.66%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
0.98%
Positive BV/share change while CGAU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.45%
We cut SG&A while CGAU invests at 305.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.