PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.64%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-56.64%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
18.61%
Positive net income growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
18.89%
Positive EPS growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
18.89%
Positive diluted EPS growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
100.92%
Share change of 100.92% while CGAU is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
100.91%
Diluted share count expanding well above CGAU's 0.25%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
146.18%
OCF growth under 50% of CGAU's 918.61%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
28.15%
FCF growth under 50% of CGAU's 220.69%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
121.16%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of CGAU's 3855.40%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
121.16%
Below 50% of CGAU's 6068.96%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
111.65%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 9.69%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
98.35%
Positive 10Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
98.35%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
93.29%
Positive short-term CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-90.99%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while CGAU stands at 88.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-90.99%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 64.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-58.70%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 38.62%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.14%
Positive asset growth while CGAU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-42.78%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.63%
SG&A declining or stable vs. CGAU's 287.57%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.