10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.16%
Negative EBIT growth while CGAU is at 195.55%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-26.58%
Negative operating income growth while CGAU is at 195.55%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-167.84%
Negative net income growth while CGAU stands at 175.53%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-108.22%
Negative EPS growth while CGAU is at 175.86%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-108.22%
Negative diluted EPS growth while CGAU is at 172.41%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-34.77%
Share reduction while CGAU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-34.76%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-415.56%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-94.65%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.47%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU stands at 129.06%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-7.47%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU is at 200.79%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
81.13%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 11.04%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-14.60%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while CGAU is at 285.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-14.60%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while CGAU is 143.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
71.46%
Positive short-term CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-60.24%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while CGAU stands at 107.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-60.24%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 63.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-29.57%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 28.75%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-5.69%
Negative asset growth while CGAU invests at 1.86%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
47.81%
BV/share growth above 1.5x CGAU's 4.83%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.58%
We expand SG&A while CGAU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.