10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.77%
Positive EBIT growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
54.67%
Positive operating income growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
58.77%
Positive net income growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
59.21%
Positive EPS growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
59.21%
Positive diluted EPS growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
54.13%
Positive OCF growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
6.15%
Positive FCF growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.21%
Below 50% of CGAU's 251.20%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
88.21%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
29.53%
Positive 10Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
41.88%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
87.90%
Positive short-term CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-44.76%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while CGAU stands at 98.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-61.64%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 78.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-7.65%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 24.53%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.37%
Negative asset growth while CGAU invests at 0.05%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-5.86%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-54.67%
We cut SG&A while CGAU invests at 5.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.