PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-184.58%
Negative EBIT growth while CGAU is at 4088.40%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-184.58%
Negative operating income growth while CGAU is at 4088.40%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-1977.81%
Negative net income growth while CGAU stands at 6082.76%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-2062.16%
Negative EPS growth while CGAU is at 6100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-1927.03%
Negative diluted EPS growth while CGAU is at 6100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.97%
Share reduction while CGAU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.97%
Reduced diluted shares while CGAU is at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
271.60%
OCF growth under 50% of CGAU's 4340.43%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-86.88%
Negative FCF growth while CGAU is at 483.79%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
138.73%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of CGAU's 6730.65%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-67.13%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU is at 218.51%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
131.43%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of CGAU's 161.70%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
29.25%
Below 50% of CGAU's 1432.53%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-5397.60%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while CGAU is 128.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-533.60%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-95.66%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while CGAU stands at 109.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-83.16%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 75.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-80.94%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 15.88%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.98%
Firm’s AR is declining while CGAU shows 20.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
100.16%
Inventory growth well above CGAU's 24.19%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-48.88%
Negative asset growth while CGAU invests at 7.38%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-65.09%
We have a declining book value while CGAU shows 7.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.69%
We expand SG&A while CGAU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.