PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.95%
Positive EBIT growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
72.95%
Positive operating income growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
96.12%
Positive net income growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
96.25%
Positive EPS growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
96.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.98%
Share change of 0.98% while CGAU is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.98%
Diluted share change of 0.98% while CGAU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-115.59%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-1638.21%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
93.72%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of CGAU's 152.71%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
96.48%
Below 50% of CGAU's 757.35%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
96.72%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
53.97%
Positive 10Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-116.59%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while CGAU is 109.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
46.85%
Positive short-term CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-88.58%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while CGAU stands at 119.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-84.51%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 79.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-76.41%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 4.75%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.67%
Our AR growth while CGAU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-177.86%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-2.52%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-11.79%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.26%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.