PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.98%
Positive EBIT growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
146.55%
Positive operating income growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
50.17%
Positive net income growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
54.55%
Positive EPS growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
54.55%
Positive diluted EPS growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
27.33%
Share count expansion well above CGAU's 0.02%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
27.32%
Diluted share count expanding well above CGAU's 0.08%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.13%
Negative OCF growth while CGAU is at 1652.74%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-65.46%
Negative FCF growth while CGAU is at 302.02%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
144.86%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of CGAU's 4021.73%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
124.70%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 14.30%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
124.88%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of CGAU's 220.10%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
99.47%
Positive 10Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
97.85%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
90.88%
Positive short-term CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-97.39%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while CGAU stands at 98.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-88.05%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 45.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-86.62%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.31%
Negative asset growth while CGAU invests at 0.28%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-35.38%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-100.00%
We’re deleveraging while CGAU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
236.01%
SG&A growth well above CGAU's 60.46%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.