PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.05%
Negative EBIT growth while CGAU is at 605.49%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-9.80%
Negative operating income growth while CGAU is at 605.49%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-11.55%
Negative net income growth while CGAU stands at 727.89%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-10.00%
Negative EPS growth while CGAU is at 766.67%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-10.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while CGAU is at 683.33%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
1.72%
Share change of 1.72% while CGAU is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
1.09%
Diluted share change of 1.09% while CGAU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-171.20%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-172.63%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
55.88%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
76.94%
Positive OCF/share growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
58.95%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
41.10%
Positive 10Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
31.99%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
48.61%
Positive short-term CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-94.89%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while CGAU stands at 97.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-89.45%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 2.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-87.15%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 2.80%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
100.00%
Inventory growth well above CGAU's 18.50%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-2.03%
Negative asset growth while CGAU invests at 0.82%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-2.81%
We have a declining book value while CGAU shows 2.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.88%
We expand SG&A while CGAU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.