PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.81%
Negative EBIT growth while CGAU is at 5678.46%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-42.49%
Negative operating income growth while CGAU is at 5678.46%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-37.81%
Negative net income growth while CGAU stands at 2198.70%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
22.08%
EPS growth under 50% of CGAU's 2700.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
22.08%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of CGAU's 7677.78%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
75.89%
Share count expansion well above CGAU's 0.07%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
75.89%
Diluted share count expanding well above CGAU's 0.17%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-68.24%
Negative OCF growth while CGAU is at 134.73%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-67.89%
Negative FCF growth while CGAU is at 585.17%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.22%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of CGAU's 899.72%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-131.43%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU is at 23.44%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-64.82%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU stands at 1646.61%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-33.36%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while CGAU is at 419.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
11.66%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
18.90%
Below 50% of CGAU's 3767.88%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-64.05%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while CGAU stands at 91.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-52.72%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 0.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-30.24%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 7.03%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
771.84%
Asset growth above 1.5x CGAU's 12.31%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
492.83%
BV/share growth above 1.5x CGAU's 4.09%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.49%
We expand SG&A while CGAU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.