PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.04%
Positive EBIT growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-0.95%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
42.08%
Positive net income growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
85.19%
Positive EPS growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
85.19%
Positive diluted EPS growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
115.79%
Share change of 115.79% while CGAU is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
115.79%
Diluted share change of 115.79% while CGAU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.30%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-84.97%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.26%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU stands at 532.81%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
9.01%
Below 50% of CGAU's 474.49%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-2134.26%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
38.65%
Below 50% of CGAU's 551.77%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
28.63%
Below 50% of CGAU's 415.39%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-33.27%
Negative 3Y CAGR while CGAU is 2142.69%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
65.17%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of CGAU's 79.86%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
230.13%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 0.15%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
1346.18%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 3.98%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.48%
Negative asset growth while CGAU invests at 1.18%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-53.50%
We have a declining book value while CGAU shows 3.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.87%
SG&A declining or stable vs. CGAU's 3.93%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.