PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.92%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x CGAU's 0.54%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-172.21%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-167.00%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-171.86%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-160.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-160.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
4.77%
Share count expansion well above CGAU's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
4.77%
Diluted share count expanding well above CGAU's 0.14%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.75%
OCF growth under 50% of CGAU's 97.03%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
3.49%
FCF growth under 50% of CGAU's 1779.93%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.39%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU is at 356.76%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-35.22%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU stands at 62.30%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-137.41%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-28.30%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while CGAU is 134.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-233.24%
Negative 3Y CAGR while CGAU is 160.02%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
73.11%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of CGAU's 93.57%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
151.95%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 5.77%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
976.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 8.18%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.86%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-24.70%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-0.62%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-5.31%
We have a declining book value while CGAU shows 1.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
167.32%
We expand SG&A while CGAU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.