PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.45%
Positive gross profit growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-134.00%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-164.76%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-132.54%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-129.31%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-133.33%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
34.28%
Share change of 34.28% while CGAU is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
34.28%
Diluted share change of 34.28% while CGAU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1030.41%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
18.55%
Positive FCF growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.11%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-85.27%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-155.93%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-130.76%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-101.36%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-6514.86%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
41.51%
Below 50% of CGAU's 93.56%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
255.92%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 18.70%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
668.36%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 15.45%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.60%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. CGAU's 44.87%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-25.21%
Inventory is declining while CGAU stands at 6.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
20.12%
Asset growth above 1.5x CGAU's 3.27%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-11.65%
We have a declining book value while CGAU shows 0.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.14%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.