PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.05%
Positive gross profit growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
4.71%
Positive EBIT growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2.30%
Positive operating income growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
4.32%
Net income growth under 50% of CGAU's 381.09%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-1.00%
Negative EPS growth while CGAU is at 533.33%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-1.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while CGAU is at 500.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
5.48%
Share count expansion well above CGAU's 0.03%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
5.48%
Diluted share count expanding well above CGAU's 0.33%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.72%
Negative OCF growth while CGAU is at 271.25%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
24.28%
FCF growth under 50% of CGAU's 95.14%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.95%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU stands at 373.18%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-297.14%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU is at 34.73%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-1146.68%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-157.42%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-342.92%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while CGAU is 2170.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-4884.52%
Negative 3Y CAGR while CGAU is 60.86%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
75.22%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of CGAU's 118.35%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
356.74%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 22.30%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
2396.47%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 17.15%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-64.97%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
6.67%
Inventory growth well above CGAU's 1.25%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-3.38%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-8.15%
We have a declining book value while CGAU shows 2.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-5.26%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.70%
We expand SG&A while CGAU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.