PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2315.49%
Negative gross profit growth while CGAU is at 127.37%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-169.17%
Negative EBIT growth while CGAU is at 135.74%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-164.37%
Negative operating income growth while CGAU is at 135.74%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-162.97%
Negative net income growth while CGAU stands at 717.36%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-89.84%
Negative EPS growth while CGAU is at 750.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-89.44%
Negative diluted EPS growth while CGAU is at 1600.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.22%
Share reduction while CGAU is at 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.22%
Reduced diluted shares while CGAU is at 0.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-151.98%
Negative OCF growth while CGAU is at 303.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
57.96%
FCF growth under 50% of CGAU's 380.13%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-747.36%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU stands at 8.66%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-2069.53%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-4739.81%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU stands at 161.60%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-3252.86%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
39.01%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-1259.31%
Negative 3Y CAGR while CGAU is 1496.69%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
41.94%
Below 50% of CGAU's 107.13%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
743.11%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 17.87%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
1977.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 23.99%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.26%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-17.07%
We have a declining book value while CGAU shows 2.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
17.91%
We have some new debt while CGAU reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.02%
SG&A growth well above CGAU's 121.71%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.