PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.20%
Positive gross profit growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
57.98%
EBIT growth above 1.5x CGAU's 7.58%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
57.14%
Operating income growth above 1.5x CGAU's 7.58%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
55.69%
Net income growth above 1.5x CGAU's 2.98%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
56.03%
EPS growth of 56.03% while CGAU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
55.94%
Diluted EPS growth of 55.94% while CGAU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
0.39%
Share change of 0.39% while CGAU is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.39%
Diluted share change of 0.39% while CGAU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.18%
Positive OCF growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-177.05%
Negative FCF growth while CGAU is at 4.29%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-109.63%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU stands at 711.08%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-5849.80%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-746.64%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU stands at 933.18%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-1416.20%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while CGAU is at 284.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-600.04%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while CGAU is 1879.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-447.13%
Negative 3Y CAGR while CGAU is 129.08%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
40.96%
Below 50% of CGAU's 117.96%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
809.76%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 21.28%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
1934.19%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 24.37%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while CGAU shows 8.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.94%
Negative asset growth while CGAU invests at 2.21%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-4.62%
We have a declining book value while CGAU shows 2.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
50.78%
Debt growth far above CGAU's 0.02%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.40%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.