PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-100.00%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
73.96%
Positive gross profit growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
16.17%
EBIT growth below 50% of CGAU's 93.89%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
2.48%
Operating income growth under 50% of CGAU's 93.89%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-0.22%
Negative net income growth while CGAU stands at 92.59%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-0.69%
Negative EPS growth while CGAU is at 92.57%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-0.69%
Negative diluted EPS growth while CGAU is at 92.59%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.60%
Share count expansion well above CGAU's 0.15%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.59%
Slight or no buyback while CGAU is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.23%
OCF growth under 50% of CGAU's 190.53%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
33.19%
FCF growth under 50% of CGAU's 99.31%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.46%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-458.46%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
27.88%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
46.25%
Positive 10Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-2405.60%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while CGAU is 12.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
2.22%
Positive short-term CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
54.61%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of CGAU's 73.41%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
1193.41%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 18.89%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-62.41%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 12.29%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.73%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
100.00%
Inventory growth well above CGAU's 8.03%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
16.36%
Asset growth above 1.5x CGAU's 0.14%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.78%
Positive BV/share change while CGAU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
151.63%
We have some new debt while CGAU reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.89%
We expand SG&A while CGAU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.