PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3737.67%
Negative gross profit growth while CGAU is at 51.26%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-129.97%
Negative EBIT growth while CGAU is at 440.27%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-88.37%
Negative operating income growth while CGAU is at 440.27%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-87.61%
Negative net income growth while CGAU stands at 263.56%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-85.67%
Negative EPS growth while CGAU is at 268.27%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-85.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while CGAU is at 244.58%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.53%
Share change of 0.53% while CGAU is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.54%
Diluted share change of 0.54% while CGAU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.49%
Negative OCF growth while CGAU is at 30.91%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-116.39%
Negative FCF growth while CGAU is at 21317.91%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.90%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 17.62%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-332.75%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-140.04%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU stands at 65.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-3.87%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-11855.16%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-579.80%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
54.07%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with CGAU's 53.84%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
372.25%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 16.21%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-47.34%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 9.01%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.79%
Firm’s AR is declining while CGAU shows 20.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.33%
Negative asset growth while CGAU invests at 3.38%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-13.63%
We have a declining book value while CGAU shows 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-1.58%
We’re deleveraging while CGAU stands at 67.79%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.67%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.