PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5586.54%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x CGAU's 28.53%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
46.96%
EBIT growth below 50% of CGAU's 354.80%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
52.67%
Operating income growth under 50% of CGAU's 354.80%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
47.48%
Net income growth under 50% of CGAU's 896.56%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-300.00%
Negative EPS growth while CGAU is at 933.33%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-312.37%
Negative diluted EPS growth while CGAU is at 922.22%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
3.68%
Slight or no buybacks while CGAU is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.67%
Slight or no buyback while CGAU is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-487.38%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-0.13%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-218.49%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-157.57%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
24.72%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-58.73%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while CGAU is at 176.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
32.07%
Below 50% of CGAU's 325.74%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
78.73%
Below 50% of CGAU's 454.86%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
91.72%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 6.22%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
-58.36%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 10.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
2.21%
Positive short-term equity growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10850.00%
Our AR growth while CGAU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.83%
Negative asset growth while CGAU invests at 14.39%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-5.78%
We have a declining book value while CGAU shows 15.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
1.18%
Debt shrinking faster vs. CGAU's 42.02%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
175.99%
We expand SG&A while CGAU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.