10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.56%
Positive revenue growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
5.78%
Positive gross profit growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-33.73%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
36.02%
Positive operating income growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-103.18%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-103.43%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-103.51%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-5.60%
Share reduction while CGAU is at 0.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-7.69%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.72%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
34.45%
Positive FCF growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
452662.29%
Positive 3Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1349.50%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 93.88%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
1029.72%
Positive OCF/share growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
520.34%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
85.45%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of CGAU's 96.14%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
88.66%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
89.51%
Positive short-term CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
176.23%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 15.21%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
9.64%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with CGAU's 8.93%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
27.12%
Positive short-term equity growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.39%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
44.93%
Inventory growth well above CGAU's 5.84%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
6.05%
Positive asset growth while CGAU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
12.45%
Positive BV/share change while CGAU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-7.95%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.06%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.