PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.76%
Revenue growth similar to CGAU's 16.36%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
23.93%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x CGAU's 1.32%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
24.05%
Positive EBIT growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
105.71%
Positive operating income growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
110.12%
Positive net income growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
95.24%
Positive EPS growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
105.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
14.91%
Slight or no buybacks while CGAU is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
8.53%
Slight or no buyback while CGAU is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.14%
Similar OCF growth to CGAU's 42.12%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
9.89%
FCF growth under 50% of CGAU's 28.68%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3757.52%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
3723.19%
Positive OCF/share growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
607.62%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1680.79%
Positive 10Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
431.09%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
297.41%
Positive short-term CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
581.22%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 47.43%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
14.40%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of CGAU's 19.39%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
81.95%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 17.85%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.40%
AR growth well above CGAU's 67.29%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
22.95%
Inventory growth well above CGAU's 29.65%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
3.76%
Positive asset growth while CGAU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-7.68%
We have a declining book value while CGAU shows 3.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-13.89%
We’re deleveraging while CGAU stands at 148.40%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.23%
SG&A growth well above CGAU's 0.79%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.