PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.91%
Negative revenue growth while CGAU stands at 8.75%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-15.73%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-23.90%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-42.51%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-29.19%
Negative net income growth while CGAU stands at 43.54%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-34.96%
Negative EPS growth while CGAU is at 43.33%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-33.82%
Negative diluted EPS growth while CGAU is at 43.33%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
1.93%
Share count expansion well above CGAU's 0.07%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.12%
Diluted share count expanding well above CGAU's 0.07%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-115.46%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-132.78%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.94%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
34.72%
Positive OCF/share growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
61.39%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
367.45%
Positive 10Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
232.82%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
173.49%
Positive short-term CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
372.05%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 33.84%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
32.63%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 12.75%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
115.79%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 12.01%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.65%
Firm’s AR is declining while CGAU shows 40.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
10.83%
We show growth while CGAU is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-2.56%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
2.43%
Positive BV/share change while CGAU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-4.31%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.82%
SG&A growth well above CGAU's 45.74%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.