PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.92%
Positive revenue growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
16.66%
Gross profit growth under 50% of CGAU's 105.39%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
24.32%
EBIT growth below 50% of CGAU's 52.12%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
70.99%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x CGAU's 52.12%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
-3.08%
Negative net income growth while CGAU stands at 45.97%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.95%
Negative diluted EPS growth while CGAU is at 47.06%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-3.08%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
1.15%
Slight or no buyback while CGAU is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
573.30%
OCF growth above 1.5x CGAU's 133.46%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
341.16%
FCF growth above 1.5x CGAU's 110.01%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1387.63%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
424.22%
Positive OCF/share growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
2558.81%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
748.61%
Positive 10Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
246.44%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
506.34%
Positive short-term CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
461.51%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 30.67%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
22.94%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 6.84%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
96.23%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 4.75%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1524.69%
Our AR growth while CGAU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
8.52%
We show growth while CGAU is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
5.47%
Positive asset growth while CGAU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
11.98%
Positive BV/share change while CGAU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-4.61%
We’re deleveraging while CGAU stands at 0.15%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.50%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.