10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.59%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-7.58%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
1.48%
Positive EBIT growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-35.23%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
23.38%
Positive net income growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
24.09%
Positive EPS growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
23.58%
Positive diluted EPS growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.43%
Slight or no buybacks while CGAU is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-3.86%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.99%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-11.64%
Negative FCF growth while CGAU is at 25.48%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1645.54%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 69.48%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
2483.86%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
820.83%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 40.21%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
301.84%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 111.22%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
7066.69%
Positive 10Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
378.04%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
500.20%
Positive short-term CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
2935.48%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 33.29%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
134.69%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 12.11%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
111.82%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 14.03%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.55%
AR growth well above CGAU's 2.44%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
1.33%
We show growth while CGAU is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-3.29%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
5.10%
Positive BV/share change while CGAU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-96.43%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.63%
We expand SG&A while CGAU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.