PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
51.64%
Positive revenue growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
20.77%
Positive gross profit growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-180.56%
Negative EBIT growth while CGAU is at 233.93%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
72.34%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of CGAU's 139.11%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
-367.69%
Negative net income growth while CGAU stands at 158.01%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-368.62%
Negative EPS growth while CGAU is at 157.69%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-381.69%
Negative diluted EPS growth while CGAU is at 152.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.22%
Slight or no buybacks while CGAU is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.22%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x CGAU's 0.47%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
818.43%
Positive OCF growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-1121.77%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
195.30%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 44.06%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
14434.01%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
3412.29%
Positive OCF/share growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
1571.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 194.26%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-47476.14%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-297.95%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while CGAU is 113.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-409.43%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
1023.12%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 30.91%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
137.82%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 12.65%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
80.89%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 11.15%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.13%
AR growth well above CGAU's 110.14%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
120.96%
We show growth while CGAU is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
203.25%
Asset growth above 1.5x CGAU's 1.96%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-12.48%
We have a declining book value while CGAU shows 0.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
19103.99%
We have some new debt while CGAU reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
173.81%
SG&A growth well above CGAU's 28.63%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.