PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-162.94%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-162.94%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
50.84%
Positive net income growth while DC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
66.67%
Positive EPS growth while DC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
66.67%
Positive diluted EPS growth while DC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
25.71%
Share count expansion well above DC's 14.84%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
25.72%
Diluted share count expanding well above DC's 14.84%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-307.65%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-945.45%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.20%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while DC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
86.34%
Positive OCF/share growth while DC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
49.53%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to DC's 52.61%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
96.51%
Positive 10Y CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
99.13%
Positive 5Y CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
95.94%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x DC's 29.50%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
-81.58%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while DC stands at 3427.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-67.38%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while DC is at 3427.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-63.19%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.73%
Positive asset growth while DC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
86.57%
Positive BV/share change while DC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.91%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.