PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.33%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-0.97%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-1.33%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.05%
Share reduction more than 1.5x DC's 14.84%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
1.05%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x DC's 14.84%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.37%
Positive OCF growth while DC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
7.52%
Positive FCF growth while DC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.91%
Positive OCF/share growth while DC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
17.97%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of DC's 52.61%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
11.93%
Positive 10Y CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
24.95%
Positive 5Y CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-24.98%
Negative 3Y CAGR while DC is 29.50%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-93.56%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while DC stands at 3427.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-91.11%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while DC is at 3427.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-88.34%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.51%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-14.55%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.97%
We expand SG&A while DC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.