PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.92%
Gross profit growth of 7.92% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
-172.21%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-167.00%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-171.86%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-160.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-160.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
4.77%
Share reduction more than 1.5x DC's 14.84%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
4.77%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x DC's 14.84%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.75%
Positive OCF growth while DC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
3.49%
Positive FCF growth while DC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.39%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-35.22%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while DC stands at 52.61%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-137.41%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-28.30%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-233.24%
Negative 3Y CAGR while DC is 29.50%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
73.11%
Below 50% of DC's 3427.35%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
151.95%
Below 50% of DC's 3427.35%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
976.09%
Positive short-term equity growth while DC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.86%
Firm’s AR is declining while DC shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-24.70%
Inventory is declining while DC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.62%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-5.31%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
167.32%
We expand SG&A while DC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.