PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-309.28%
Negative gross profit growth while DC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-32.57%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-28.84%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-32.57%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-24.57%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-24.57%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.17%
Share reduction more than 1.5x DC's 14.84%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.17%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x DC's 14.84%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-62.25%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-62.94%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.74%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-1251.41%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-12854.72%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while DC stands at 52.61%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-51.75%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-385.52%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-794.31%
Negative 3Y CAGR while DC is 29.50%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
88.07%
Below 50% of DC's 3427.35%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
357.57%
Below 50% of DC's 3427.35%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
2821.64%
Positive short-term equity growth while DC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while DC shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
2.41%
Positive asset growth while DC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.06%
Positive BV/share change while DC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
90.44%
We have some new debt while DC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.12%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.