PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3737.67%
Negative gross profit growth while DC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-129.97%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-88.37%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-87.61%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-85.67%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-85.67%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.53%
Share reduction more than 1.5x DC's 14.84%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.54%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x DC's 14.84%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.49%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-116.39%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.90%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while DC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-332.75%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-140.04%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while DC stands at 52.61%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-3.87%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-11855.16%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-579.80%
Negative 3Y CAGR while DC is 29.50%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
54.07%
Below 50% of DC's 3427.35%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
372.25%
Below 50% of DC's 3427.35%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-47.34%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.79%
Firm’s AR is declining while DC shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.33%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-13.63%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-1.58%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.67%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.