PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
93.98%
Gross profit growth of 93.98% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
-315.21%
Negative EBIT growth while DC is at 64.33%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-97.02%
Negative operating income growth while DC is at 64.33%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-246.36%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-242.86%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-242.86%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
1.38%
Share reduction more than 1.5x DC's 16.83%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
1.38%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x DC's 16.81%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-848.72%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-29.48%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.17%
OCF/share CAGR of 11.17% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-9768.63%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while DC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-160.70%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while DC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-67.17%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while DC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-731.94%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while DC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-133.30%
Negative 3Y CAGR while DC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
165.49%
Equity/share CAGR of 165.49% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
1703.99%
Equity/share CAGR of 1703.99% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
-10.77%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while DC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
140.85%
AR growth of 140.85% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.36%
Negative asset growth while DC invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-2.16%
We have a declining book value while DC shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-1.09%
We’re deleveraging while DC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.90%
We expand SG&A while DC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.