PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.76%
Revenue growth of 15.76% while DC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
23.93%
Gross profit growth of 23.93% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
24.05%
EBIT growth of 24.05% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
105.71%
Positive operating income growth while DC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
110.12%
Positive net income growth while DC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
95.24%
Positive EPS growth while DC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
105.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while DC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
14.91%
Slight or no buybacks while DC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
8.53%
Slight or no buyback while DC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.14%
OCF growth under 50% of DC's 99.90%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
9.89%
FCF growth under 50% of DC's 99.91%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3757.52%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while DC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
3723.19%
Positive OCF/share growth while DC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
607.62%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1680.79%
Positive 10Y CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
431.09%
Positive 5Y CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
297.41%
Positive short-term CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
581.22%
Equity/share CAGR of 581.22% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
14.40%
Equity/share CAGR of 14.40% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
81.95%
Equity/share CAGR of 81.95% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.40%
Our AR growth while DC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
22.95%
Inventory growth of 22.95% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
3.76%
Positive asset growth while DC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-7.68%
We have a declining book value while DC shows 84.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-13.89%
We’re deleveraging while DC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.23%
SG&A declining or stable vs. DC's 214.02%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.