PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.40%
Revenue growth of 4.40% while DC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
3.99%
Gross profit growth under 50% of DC's 42.90%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-335.97%
Negative EBIT growth while DC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-37.40%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-1188.31%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-1224.26%
Negative EPS growth while DC is at 9.09%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-1287.50%
Negative diluted EPS growth while DC is at 9.09%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.22%
Share reduction more than 1.5x DC's 10.62%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-5.12%
Reduced diluted shares while DC is at 10.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.45%
Negative OCF growth while DC is at 31.39%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-19.23%
Negative FCF growth while DC is at 29.74%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1396.49%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while DC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
175.98%
Positive OCF/share growth while DC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
756.08%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-18.94%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-95.03%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-456.88%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
1373.63%
Equity/share CAGR of 1373.63% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
74.79%
Equity/share CAGR of 74.79% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
81.70%
Equity/share CAGR of 81.70% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.97%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
2.55%
Inventory growth of 2.55% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-17.28%
Negative asset growth while DC invests at 14.91%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-12.49%
We have a declining book value while DC shows 1.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-34.48%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.80%
SG&A declining or stable vs. DC's 388.66%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.