PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.59%
Negative revenue growth while DC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-7.58%
Negative gross profit growth while DC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
1.48%
EBIT growth below 50% of DC's 40.23%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
-35.23%
Negative operating income growth while DC is at 40.51%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
23.38%
Net income growth at 50-75% of DC's 40.12%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
24.09%
EPS growth at 50-75% of DC's 41.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
23.58%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of DC's 41.73%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
0.43%
Share count expansion well above DC's 0.67%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-3.86%
Reduced diluted shares while DC is at 0.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.99%
Negative OCF growth while DC is at 5.30%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-11.64%
Negative FCF growth while DC is at 7.37%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1645.54%
3Y CAGR of 1645.54% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
2483.86%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while DC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
820.83%
Positive OCF/share growth while DC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
301.84%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
7066.69%
Positive 10Y CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
378.04%
Positive 5Y CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
500.20%
Positive short-term CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
2935.48%
Equity/share CAGR of 2935.48% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
134.69%
Equity/share CAGR of 134.69% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
111.82%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x DC's 24.08%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.55%
AR growth of 4.55% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
1.33%
Inventory growth of 1.33% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-3.29%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
5.10%
Positive BV/share change while DC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-96.43%
We’re deleveraging while DC stands at 132.77%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.63%
SG&A growth well above DC's 30.01%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.