10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-144.77%
Negative EBIT growth while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-144.77%
Negative operating income growth while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-124.51%
Negative net income growth while FURY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-124.53%
Negative EPS growth while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-124.53%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-166.84%
Negative OCF growth while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-166.84%
Negative FCF growth while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-101.69%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-101.69%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-101.69%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-426.11%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-426.11%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FURY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-426.11%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FURY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
25.40%
Equity/share CAGR of 25.40% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
25.40%
Equity/share CAGR of 25.40% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
25.40%
Equity/share CAGR of 25.40% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.75%
Firm’s AR is declining while FURY shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.50%
Negative asset growth while FURY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-7.51%
We have a declining book value while FURY shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
144.44%
SG&A growth of 144.44% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.