10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-210.15%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-212.00%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-694.18%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-685.71%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-685.71%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.96%
Positive OCF growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-30.32%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-151.71%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-151.71%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FURY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-151.71%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FURY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
13.47%
Equity/share CAGR of 13.47% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
13.47%
Equity/share CAGR of 13.47% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
13.47%
Equity/share CAGR of 13.47% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.89%
AR growth of 56.89% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-83.60%
Inventory is declining while FURY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.82%
Asset growth of 4.82% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
4.29%
BV/share growth of 4.29% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
212.00%
SG&A growth well above FURY's 68.31%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.