PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.92%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-1.52%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-10.21%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-2.62%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-2.62%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
13.35%
Slight or no buybacks while FURY is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
13.35%
Slight or no buyback while FURY is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.78%
OCF growth above 1.5x FURY's 2.95%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
-144.35%
Negative FCF growth while FURY is at 2.95%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-482.18%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FURY is at 49.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-482.18%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FURY is 49.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-482.18%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FURY is 49.57%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-40.18%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while FURY stands at 111.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-40.18%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 111.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-40.18%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 111.08%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
85.79%
AR growth well above FURY's 12.18%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.27%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-28.20%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.56%
SG&A declining or stable vs. FURY's 133.25%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.