PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.95%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-21.95%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-22.57%
Negative net income growth while FURY stands at 23.62%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-22.89%
Negative EPS growth while FURY is at 24.68%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-22.89%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FURY is at 24.68%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
52.43%
Positive OCF growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
76.02%
Positive FCF growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.22%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-23.22%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-23.22%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
88.83%
Positive 10Y CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
88.83%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
88.83%
Positive short-term CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-77.26%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while FURY stands at 39.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-77.26%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 39.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-77.26%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 39.15%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.36%
Firm’s AR is declining while FURY shows 83.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-619524.61%
Inventory is declining while FURY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
88.59%
Positive asset growth while FURY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
72.07%
Positive BV/share change while FURY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.15%
SG&A declining or stable vs. FURY's 171.77%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.