PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.12%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-21.12%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
35.73%
Positive net income growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
54.25%
Positive EPS growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
54.25%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
40.22%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FURY's 86.31%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
40.22%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FURY's 86.31%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-107.37%
Negative OCF growth while FURY is at 62.35%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-482.29%
Negative FCF growth while FURY is at 18.02%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.34%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY stands at 49.71%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-91.34%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY is at 49.71%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-91.34%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY stands at 49.71%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
13.40%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of FURY's 26.33%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
13.40%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of FURY's 26.33%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
13.40%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of FURY's 26.33%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
-51.58%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while FURY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-51.58%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-51.58%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
210.89%
AR growth well above FURY's 27.66%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
4.57%
Asset growth well under 50% of FURY's 461.13%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-28.71%
We have a declining book value while FURY shows 205.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.51%
SG&A declining or stable vs. FURY's 94.69%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.