PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.24%
EBIT growth 50-75% of FURY's 31.24%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
-75.08%
Negative operating income growth while FURY is at 31.24%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
27.82%
Net income growth at 50-75% of FURY's 38.31%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
-61.17%
Negative EPS growth while FURY is at 38.27%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-61.17%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FURY is at 38.27%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
8.45%
Share change of 8.45% while FURY is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
8.45%
Diluted share change of 8.45% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
159.70%
OCF growth above 1.5x FURY's 90.56%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
92.07%
FCF growth similar to FURY's 87.55%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
178.85%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
178.85%
Positive OCF/share growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
139.10%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-50.96%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-50.96%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FURY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
71.31%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 71.31% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
-23.96%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while FURY stands at 268.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-23.96%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 268.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-39.36%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 268.08%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-74.38%
Firm’s AR is declining while FURY shows 28.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.07%
Asset growth above 1.5x FURY's 6.40%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
11.50%
BV/share growth above 1.5x FURY's 2.62%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.09%
We expand SG&A while FURY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.