PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.45%
EBIT growth above 1.5x FURY's 26.06%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
44.45%
Operating income growth above 1.5x FURY's 26.06%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
44.46%
Positive net income growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
44.44%
Positive EPS growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
44.44%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.03%
Slight or no buybacks while FURY is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.03%
Slight or no buyback while FURY is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.67%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-81.10%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.07%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
38.07%
Positive OCF/share growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
85.35%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 44.30%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-98.58%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-98.58%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FURY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
88.82%
Positive short-term CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-34.68%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while FURY stands at 126.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-34.68%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 126.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-34.20%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 62.36%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.49%
Positive asset growth while FURY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
0.98%
Positive BV/share change while FURY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.45%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.