10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.64%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-56.64%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
18.61%
Net income growth at 50-75% of FURY's 26.62%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
18.89%
EPS growth at 50-75% of FURY's 26.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
18.89%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of FURY's 26.83%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
100.92%
Share count expansion well above FURY's 0.01%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
100.91%
Diluted share change of 100.91% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
146.18%
Positive OCF growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
28.15%
Positive FCF growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
121.16%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 8.75%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
121.16%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 8.75%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
111.65%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
98.35%
Positive 10Y CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
98.35%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
93.29%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 37.22%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
-90.99%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while FURY stands at 114.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-90.99%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 114.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-58.70%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.14%
Positive asset growth while FURY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-42.78%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.63%
SG&A growth well above FURY's 46.86%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.