PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.16%
Negative EBIT growth while FURY is at 9.18%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-26.58%
Negative operating income growth while FURY is at 9.18%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-167.84%
Negative net income growth while FURY stands at 12.25%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-108.22%
Negative EPS growth while FURY is at 11.67%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-108.22%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FURY is at 11.67%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-34.77%
Share reduction while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-34.76%
Reduced diluted shares while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-415.56%
Negative OCF growth while FURY is at 88.57%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-94.65%
Negative FCF growth while FURY is at 88.57%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.47%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY stands at 79.13%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-7.47%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY is at 79.13%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
81.13%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to FURY's 82.18%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
-14.60%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FURY is at 33.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-14.60%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FURY is 33.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
71.46%
Positive short-term CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-60.24%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while FURY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-60.24%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-29.57%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 22.47%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while FURY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-5.69%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
47.81%
Positive BV/share change while FURY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.58%
We expand SG&A while FURY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.