10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.74%
Negative EBIT growth while FURY is at 19.27%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-20.74%
Negative operating income growth while FURY is at 18.63%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-20.74%
Negative net income growth while FURY stands at 13.62%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-19.35%
Negative EPS growth while FURY is at 13.70%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-19.35%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FURY is at 13.70%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
52.40%
Positive OCF growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
127.62%
Positive FCF growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
84.97%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
92.55%
Positive OCF/share growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
91.37%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-64.44%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
68.74%
Net income/share CAGR of 68.74% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
62.99%
Positive short-term CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-48.46%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while FURY stands at 42.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-58.90%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 42.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-6.03%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.13%
AR growth of 42.13% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.59%
Positive asset growth while FURY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-0.90%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.73%
SG&A growth well above FURY's 35.55%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.