PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
170.79%
EBIT growth above 1.5x FURY's 42.61%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
-120.49%
Negative operating income growth while FURY is at 42.61%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
45.92%
Net income growth comparable to FURY's 43.74%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
46.77%
EPS growth similar to FURY's 43.63%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
46.77%
Similar diluted EPS growth to FURY's 43.63%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
13.36%
Share count expansion well above FURY's 0.01%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
13.36%
Diluted share count expanding well above FURY's 0.00%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
251.77%
OCF growth above 1.5x FURY's 33.08%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
185.36%
FCF growth above 1.5x FURY's 33.08%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
146.93%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
111.10%
Positive OCF/share growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-40.49%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
34.31%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 34.31% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
96.30%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
56.49%
Positive short-term CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-83.26%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while FURY stands at 117.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-83.13%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 56.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-77.98%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while FURY shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while FURY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-10.32%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
10.55%
Positive BV/share change while FURY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-170.79%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.