PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2315.49%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-169.17%
Negative EBIT growth while FURY is at 72.22%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-164.37%
Negative operating income growth while FURY is at 72.22%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-162.97%
Negative net income growth while FURY stands at 68.60%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-89.84%
Negative EPS growth while FURY is at 70.38%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-89.44%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FURY is at 70.38%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.22%
Share reduction while FURY is at 2.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.22%
Reduced diluted shares while FURY is at 2.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-151.98%
Negative OCF growth while FURY is at 52.53%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
57.96%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x FURY's 49.53%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-747.36%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-2069.53%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-4739.81%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-3252.86%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
39.01%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-1259.31%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
41.94%
Below 50% of FURY's 782.43%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
743.11%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 161.76%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
1977.09%
Positive short-term equity growth while FURY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.26%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-17.07%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
17.91%
Debt growth of 17.91% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.02%
We expand SG&A while FURY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.