PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-90.87%
Negative revenue growth while FURY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-38.80%
Negative gross profit growth while FURY is at 60.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-24.18%
Negative EBIT growth while FURY is at 21.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-24.14%
Negative operating income growth while FURY is at 9.82%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-34.40%
Negative net income growth while FURY stands at 22.34%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-26.52%
Negative EPS growth while FURY is at 22.78%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-26.52%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FURY is at 22.78%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
3.12%
Share count expansion well above FURY's 0.63%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.12%
Diluted share count expanding well above FURY's 0.63%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.31%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-60.27%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.44%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-447.25%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-557.59%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
63.61%
Positive 10Y CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-884.26%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-384.82%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
34.53%
Below 50% of FURY's 493.17%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
697.67%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 279.21%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
271.44%
Positive short-term equity growth while FURY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.46%
AR growth well above FURY's 57.14%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
40.23%
Inventory growth of 40.23% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-0.41%
Negative asset growth while FURY invests at 3.70%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-4.99%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
30.13%
Debt growth of 30.13% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.02%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.