PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3737.67%
Negative gross profit growth while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-129.97%
Negative EBIT growth while FURY is at 39.55%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-88.37%
Negative operating income growth while FURY is at 44.65%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-87.61%
Negative net income growth while FURY stands at 10.81%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-85.67%
Negative EPS growth while FURY is at 20.08%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-85.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FURY is at 20.08%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.53%
Slight or no buybacks while FURY is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.54%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FURY's 23617.30%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.49%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-116.39%
Negative FCF growth while FURY is at 0.91%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.90%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-332.75%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-140.04%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY stands at 71.96%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-3.87%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-11855.16%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-579.80%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FURY is 66.72%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
54.07%
Below 50% of FURY's 291.28%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
372.25%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 20.86%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-47.34%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.79%
Firm’s AR is declining while FURY shows 29.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.33%
Negative asset growth while FURY invests at 30.24%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-13.63%
We have a declining book value while FURY shows 88.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-1.58%
We’re deleveraging while FURY stands at 1.88%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.67%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.