PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
93.98%
Gross profit growth of 93.98% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
-315.21%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-97.02%
Negative operating income growth while FURY is at 10.16%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-246.36%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-242.86%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-242.86%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
1.38%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FURY's 26.89%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
1.38%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FURY's 2.87%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-848.72%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-29.48%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.17%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-9768.63%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-160.70%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY stands at 84.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-67.17%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-731.94%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FURY is 12.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-133.30%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FURY is 92.18%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
165.49%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of FURY's 250.92%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
1703.99%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-10.77%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
140.85%
AR growth well above FURY's 206.69%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.36%
Negative asset growth while FURY invests at 5.88%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-2.16%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-1.09%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.90%
We expand SG&A while FURY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.