PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.52%
Negative gross profit growth while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-5.32%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-6.92%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
0.08%
Positive net income growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.70%
Slight or no buybacks while FURY is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.70%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FURY's 51.75%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.34%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x FURY's 46.28%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
-97.04%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.31%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-460.51%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-292.15%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY stands at 15.94%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-35.33%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-376.05%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-91.88%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
54.61%
Below 50% of FURY's 1341.02%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
1898.00%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 62.55%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-34.44%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 95.66%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.30%
AR growth well above FURY's 6.16%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.38%
Asset growth well under 50% of FURY's 216.96%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
0.21%
Under 50% of FURY's 293.95%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
226.19%
Debt growth of 226.19% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.29%
We cut SG&A while FURY invests at 163.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.